Purpose: to determine the predictive value of trans-abdominal (TA) US in assessing thickness of lower uterine segment by measuring lower uterine segment (LUS) scar thickness at term in patient with previous CS. Patient and methods: This study was carried out as tool- assessment cross-sectional case study on pregnant females, who had previous cesarean section at 36-40W of gestation and planning for elective CS. LUS thickness measured by TAUS and measured by the surgeon after labour using a sterile vernier caliper. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values of the TAUS measurement was determined. Results: eighty nine women were studied at a mean gestational age of 38.5±0.59weeks. With cut-off value equal to or less than 2.4 mm , the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values were 90%, 100%, 100%, and 98.7%, respectively. Conclusion: LUS measurement is a useful clinical tool in the prediction of scar integrity. It should be performed routinely in women who had a previous cesarean before labour.
Azeem, A., Ibrahim, D., & Shazely, S. (2014). THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LOWER SEGMENT SCAR INTEGRITY IN PATIENT WITH PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION NEAR TERM. Zagazig University Medical Journal, 20(4), 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2014.4412
MLA
Ahmed Azeem; Doaa Ibrahim; Sheen Shazely. "THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LOWER SEGMENT SCAR INTEGRITY IN PATIENT WITH PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION NEAR TERM". Zagazig University Medical Journal, 20, 4, 2014, 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2014.4412
HARVARD
Azeem, A., Ibrahim, D., Shazely, S. (2014). 'THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LOWER SEGMENT SCAR INTEGRITY IN PATIENT WITH PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION NEAR TERM', Zagazig University Medical Journal, 20(4), pp. 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2014.4412
VANCOUVER
Azeem, A., Ibrahim, D., Shazely, S. THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF LOWER SEGMENT SCAR INTEGRITY IN PATIENT WITH PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION NEAR TERM. Zagazig University Medical Journal, 2014; 20(4): 1-8. doi: 10.21608/zumj.2014.4412